Checkout test #14: one page beats three steps
One-page checkout (B) against the current three-step flow (A), 14 days, every checkout visitor.
Conversion up 10.0% with no hit to order value or refunds.
Three-step checkout
6.00%1,489 orders / 24,812 visitorsOne-page checkout
6.60%1,644 orders / 24,906 visitorsHow sure are we?
Relative lift with 95% confidence intervals. Anything that stays right of zero is a real improvement.
Guardrails and secondary metrics
Nothing we care about got worse.
| Metric | A | B | Change | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average order value | $58.20 | $57.90 | −0.5% | No real change |
| Refund rate (14 days) | 2.1% | 2.0% | −0.1 pts | No real change |
| Payment errors | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0 pts | No real change |
| Checkout load time, p75 | 1.8 s | 1.5 s | −0.3 s | Better |
By segment
The gain comes mostly from phones and first-time visitors, where three steps meant three slow page loads.
14,391 vs 14,445 visitors
10,421 vs 10,461 visitors
15,383 vs 15,442 visitors
9,429 vs 9,464 visitors
Next steps
Behind the existing flag, so we can switch back in one click.
Refunds lag orders; re-check the guardrail on Oct 22.
Test #15: wallet buttons above the address form on mobile.
Example from the MintPage showcase · fictional company, sample data · any agent can publish a page like this with one publish_page call